The clip-in Astronomik 12nm Ha is one of their most popular filters ever and for good reason! The other one is the inevitable and persistent regret that, because of chromatic aberration, the full 75mm aperture of this beautiful lens can not be used in full visible spectrum photography. Nikon 300/4 ED IF, Sigma 50/2.8 DG Macro (not a telephoto, but good). For me, that's enough. KevinS, in my experience stopping down dramatically improves image quality in terms of chromatic aberration, coma and astigmatism. The one and only 300mm lens I tested is the Zeiss Tele-Tessar 300mm F4. From the moment I reviewed the first sub-exposure on the display screen of my camera, I feel in love with the mid-range magnification of a 135mm lens. This looks to be an excellent lens with fantastic results. With no general agreement about what Bokeh is it is little wonder that there is so much argument and disagreement. While there are certainly pricey 135mm F2 lenses out there (such as the aforementioned Sigma 135mm F1.8 Art, or the Carl Zeiss 135mm) there are a couple that give you extreme value for the money. I do not use burst mode, but the lens would produce movie-like frames. All of them are extremely sharp and produce mouth-watering bokeh, and all of them are reasonably priced for what you get. Not another article that promotes portraits shot with wide open lens and out of focus highlights in the background. What I see is a photographer who should maybe instead stick to the kit lens, and learn composition first. It actually makes my eyes water as I try to resolve how bad the blurriness is. The image is a 90-second exposure at ISO 400 using a Canon EOS 60Da. I would never shell out hundreds of euros for a 135 prime let alone one with manual focus. The first telephoto lens of choice, especially recommended for beginners, is the 135mm F2.5 SMC Pentax. As you'd expect though, distortion and light falloff are both higher with a full-frame image circle, but perhaps not as much as you'd normally expect. The Rokinon 135mm F/2 ED UMC lens. Im a newbie at astro.. and photography in general really! You currently have javascript disabled. The Bokeh includes as well all that is in the focus, but mainly talked about how it comes visible in out of focus areas. In these situations, a portable, wide-field imaging rig wins. I've missed shots at wide apertures because the DOF is so extremely thin. It is fantastic on my old 5d. I think they are an outstanding value for any wide-field astrophotographer, and are particularly suitable for newcomers. I use it routinely in preference to many other multicoated filters I tested, including the new Hoya MC UV. Im so new to all of this so thank you for your insightful and educational posts. Looking forward to allow purchasing the Canon 200mm f/2.8L II USM. I have the Canon EF 135mm, f2L USM. When I got home and loaded the photo into Lightroom I was blown away by two things. Technical Specifications Looking for specific info? It is NOT extremely sharp wide open, it often requires massive AF adjustment on DLSRs (sometimes beyond what the body allows as micro-adjustment) and AF is not reliable enough to consistently ensure sharp focus at full aperture. Its a trade-off, and one that seems to surface time and time again in this hobby. So, for Joe User or especially for Jane Client, one really has to look closely to see much of a difference. I have compared many times my 135/2 against my 100/2.8 and there is a big difference. So I feel I'm being cheated. Tack sharp at f/2. If you must have autofocus, and care about weight, buy the Canon. "If you are a Nikon user, of course have a look at the Nikon AF Nikkor 135mm f/2D DC and compare it to the other lenses mentioned in this article. The difference between modern and old telephoto lenses is probably similar to the difference between my APO and an old Jaegers 5in F5. (purchased for $899), reviewed December 9th, 2006 - Actually though, it's performance is so good that you really have to consider it a bargain, even at the $800-900 street price. The size (3.2 x 4.4"/82.5 x 112mm) and weight (1.7 lb/750g) (and color) of this lens are not imposing - you probably won't get much attent Besides, adding IS would mean adding extra elements and that would very likely reduce the image quality. No more inside shooting with flash! When the aperture is stopped down to 37mm using step-down filter rings, this lens produces incredibly tiny pinpoint star images from edge to edge. Olympus 4x Optical Zoom f/2 Lens; 25-100mm (35mm Equivalent) Show More. Youll never have to worry about losing your position just by touching the lens, but you can always tape the position down to be sure. No telephoto lens can be used with cameras modified by the removal of the internal UV/IR cut filter and anti-aliasing filter. 30-35% diameter reduction is usually necessary on "good" lenses. Rudy, why didn t you include any L lenses from canon? Still, all things considered, I prize this lens very highly and can not imagine giving it up. The Samyang 135mm f/2 lens is very wide in astrophotography terms. (And cost less too). wew.. Second of all, the incredible sharpness of the photo: I have owned many lenses, most of which I bought because they were supposed to have world-class sharpness, but the Samyang 135mm still stands out to me. The APO showed no chromatic aberration at all with the addition of the Astronomik UV/IR cut clip filter (passing 380-680nm), but the telephoto lenses, even when stopped down, showed a tight bright red ring around all stars. These capable cameras should be solid and well-built, have both the speed and focus to capture fast action and offer professional-level image quality. This photo was captured with the Samyang 135mm F/2 lens using a UV/IR cut filter and a QHY168C dedicated astronomy camera. It is good to know that the 200/4 SMC Takumar is good. My guidescope is a 5in F5 Jaeger's achromat with a 2.3x Barlow, and a 9mm illuminated reticle eyepiece. Can't argue with your reasoning, Juksu, about the framing of the article, but just stopping by to say I really liked that cat picture, am shopping for a new smartphone, struck that this type of photo is in another league - all newbie observations, of course, which sort of supports your thoughts that an article like this would be better framed as a "Love this new long lens stuff" sort of thing. However, for $15 I also bought an old Tamron Adaptall 2, 135 mm f2.5. (purchased for $890), reviewed October 21st, 2005 Sharp, handy, strong colours and contrast. The first example is good to show that you can take photos of persons in front of an ugly background without completely ruining the shot (important for people shooting events), the last one is the only one I really like (because of the color) but you could shoot this with any lens with short MFD. The version I have has the mount for Canon EOS camera bodies, but there are several different lens mounts available on Amazon. The Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 includes a lens hood, lens pouch, front and rear lens caps, and a 1-year Rokinon manufacturer warranty. It focuses within a blink of an eye, instantly. Really like the large focusing ring. Large emission nebulae like the California Nebula (pictured below) are a great choice for this focal length. The focuser adjustment rotates roughly 270 degrees, meaning fine-tuning on a bright star is more precise. Any experience with this camera and would this lens be a good fit? If this was used to shoot video you would think that the first image was using a green screen. Also, we ought never question or diminish the joy of others. Thanks to you I got a Rokinon 14mm f2.8 and a 24mm f 1.4 and am considering this lens at the moment, but wonder how it compares to the Canon 135 mm f/2. There is no doubt that the 135L deserves it excellent reputation for image quality. I ordered this lens on Amazon, utilizing my Amazon Prime membership. thanks for the write-up.. i just got this lens and have just been trying it out. Fantastic IQ & Bokeh. As you'd expect from a premium prime lens, both maximum and average chromatic aberration is very low across the aperture range, with the maximum CA on the order of 0.02% of frame height regardless of aperture. Based on my handful of experiences with this lens in the backyard, I have found these traits to hold true. Has a good weight to it. Not only does the Rokinon 135 add additional reach, but I can also now shoot at F/2, instead of F/4 on the Canon. Not heavy like the white tele-zooms. I really wanted to use, and like, a 135mm f2 lens so I bought the Canon version. Digital sensors are roughly 5 times as sharp as 400-speed film. Probably you could get a very similar image with a 85mm 1.8. Oh and it's stabilised. That is the story.#7: Leaves.That doesn't work. Ironically all the sample images in this post are painfully soft. The 135mm focal length is absolutely perfect for the Heart and Soul Nebulae if youre using a crop sensor DSLR camera. Check them out for yourself! Everyone should have one? It is a heavy lens. The downsides of this configuration are that shooting wide open can make focusing difficult. These were just a tad less sharp at the corners than their Canon competition, but certainly extremely sharp all over the field if closed down one stop or even half a stop. To achieve creamy bokeh, a lens should have a wide maximum aperture and a long focal length. . the lens is built strong, very strong. How's that for an endorsement? Love the shot of the blue anemone, which also displays nice bokeh, and blur! It would seem to be a better use of a camera to first look for a suitable background, and then and only then to use bokeh. I use the word design, because although the available 135mm F2 lenses aren't the exact same optical formula, they share many important traits. This is one of my all time favourites. Valerio, Electronically Assisted Astronomy (No Post-Processing), Community Forum Software by IP.BoardLicensed to: Cloudy Nights, DSLR, Mirrorless & General-Purpose Digital Camera DSO Imaging, This is not recommended for shared computers, Back to DSLR, Mirrorless & General-Purpose Digital Camera DSO Imaging, Buckeyestargazer 2022 in review and New Products. Available Monday. This includes everything from the rich star fields of Sagittarius, to a complete look at the Andromeda Galaxy. There was no reason to test any other because, when stopped down to 49mm, F6.1, this lens is simply perfect, comparable to any APO on the market. There are, of course, outlierssuch as the legendary unicorn lens Canon EF 200mm F2but that one isn't a great alternative unless you are cool with spending $5,700 and carrying around something about as wieldy as a fire hydrant. Find out what happens when Chris shoots some very expired APS film using old Canon and Nikon cameras. You get what you get.#4: Cat in Underbrush.That's pretty good.#5: Woman with Blanket.It's like a snapshot. when you hold the lens in your hand you know you are holding a fine peice of optical equipment. This makes me feel I shall take the Zeiss 85F1.8 off my A6000 or maybe NOT, it's just another hype article about "A" lens. But, since fast 300mm ED lenses are beyond my toy budget, I would appreciate seeing magnified center and corner test images of actual star fields. 645 lenses such as the mamiya apo line and pentax edif can operate within these conditions without vignetting on apsc sensors. (purchased for $725), reviewed March 26th, 2013 Please re-enable javascript to access full functionality. This lens provides all of these requirements. Please send your photos of the Andromeda galaxy. The Best Telephoto Lenses for Astrophotography. The 135 is lighter, but that's its only advantage. When i check a F stop chart, i see 15 stops if i count the main, and the secondary ones: 2, 2.4, 2.8, 3.3, 4, 4.8, 5.6, 6.7, 8, 9.5, 11, 13, 16, 19, 22. Bokeh is buttery smooth, best you can get from a 135mm. Part of it might be that they were designed for film photography and modern digital sensor are far more demanding in terms of optical quality. Literally it means "blur" so you could just as well use the dictionary definition below the top match from Google search: Bokeh - the visual quality of the out-of-focus areas of a photographic image, especially as rendered by a particular lens. It's bokeh is comparable to the 85mm 1.2 but IMO not as nice. Moreover if we have a serendipitous moment regarding a new (or used) lens, that's a good thing. Great post; thanks for the detailed information. Adam007,"a headshot is exactly where I want to see all those megapixels"No thanks. Many students just wanted to take better snapshots of family, vacation, pets, etc. This criticism refers to rare cases when your main subject matter is flat and completely inside the limited DOF range while the rest of the image is outside. Samyang should definitely make 135 f2 with the same optical formula and AF for Sony EFF and also Nikon F plus Canon EF mount if possible. The 135mm F2 lens design is truly special, and in this article (and the video I made), I want to try to convince you as well. This article was originally published on Micael's blog, and is being republished in full with express permission. Bond, I expect you to buy! Got it! Yes the Samyang is good and yes there are lenses with bad bokeh. Another lens to consider at this focal length (at maximum zoom) is the Rokinon 135mm F/2. The lens shows a very slight pincushion distortion, but it's well under 0.1% of frame height, an excellent performance by any measure. The North America Nebula captured using the 135mm lens with a clip-in Ha filter. Defocus control enables the photographer to use an aperture of f/4 for the subject and to adjust the amount of background blur or the amount of foreground blur. The best of them, Nikon's 70-200E, is just as sharp all but the very best primes - ie, already too sharp for most portrait work. With this lens you don't need to do much if any post processing. These are affordably available on eBay, and result in perfectly round star images, the way nature intended them to be. Rokinon lenses are made in Korea, and so is the Samyang variation. Although typically unused in astrophotography, I did get a chance to see the beautiful bokeh this lens creates when shooting at F/2. At $900 US it a relative steal. For the rest there is Sigma 135 /1.8 Art also fantastic value lens. Personally, I can't stand these circles, and I see them as VERY distracting.Lots of fads come and go, and this is just another one of these fads that some photographers are obsessed with. Dear Trevor, It allows to push your main subject matter into abstraction wide open and get very detailed images stopped down. Barney and Chris have been shooting the new Sony 50mm F1.4 GM, and we have a bunch of full resolution samples for you to peruse. The few occasions I use a 135 FL usually are landscape shots (where I have no use for f2) and childrens playing (where I need zoom and fast af). The lens hood is not petal-shaped, which is great news for those using this lens for astrophotography. In this buying guide weve rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing around $2000 and recommended the best. Are you really using 135 a lot? Build quality: excellent. Of the 150 images I considered fit to publish, only 4 were made with the 135. Show some humility and don't troll. If you can afford it buy this lens, you will love it. Bokeh == Visual character of the lens optics to render light and color mixing together. So so far the best that I have used are the 200f2.8L and the 400f5.6L. Because it manage to do so. :). You will see why. It improves slightly stopped down. In this review, however, I am using the lens on a crop sensor (APS-C) Canon EOS 60Da, which puts the field of view at 12.4 degrees. This lens is one of canons finest lenses i have ever used. (Dpreview), Use the 500 Rule to find the Perfect Exposure Length for Astrophotography, Use a DSLR Ha Filter for Astrophotography, AstroBackyard | Astrophotography Tips and Tutorials2023, Optical Construction: 11 Glass elements in 7 Groups. My canon is clear modded and I use a an Astronomik EOS-clip L filter to block the uv and ir. It's tiny compared to almost everything else in the 85-135 range, and used properly, it can produce results that hold up to my DC (all other factors being equal such as subject distance, f-stop, lighting, etc.). To see even more example photos using the Rokinon 135mm lens (or Samyang branded version), go ahead a perform a search on Astrobin or Flickr, with the appropriate filter. Exposure uniformity (vignetting) is also really excellent, reaching a maximum of 1/4 EV (on a camera with an APS-C size sensor) at f/2, and dropping to well under 1/10 EV at f/2.8 and above. In the past, Ive covered a number of different lenses, from the Sigma 24mm F/1.4 to the Canon EF 300mm F/4L. Does the bright star reflection bother you? I hear great things about the Canon 200/2.8 L but do not have one. Magical images, great AF, great close focusing abilities. Hate these presumptuous kinds of articles and headlines. While some people LOVE the bokeh circles (first photo), others hate them and consider them a distraction.The 50mm f/1.8 is hardly a lens to talk about. Light weight and robust. The lens is not weather-sealed, so you definitely dont want to leave your camera and lens (and your tracking mount!) And with our first long lenses we were all impressed were we not? Thanks, Chris, hi Trevor my name is sagar i have same lens but i have one question why lot of stars are appearing in my image which is taken thru rokinon 135mm, Your email address will not be published. This is a stunning lens, clearly one of the very best lenses that Canon produces, this is in the same world class as the 35 1.4, 85 1.2 L lenses. Definitely now on my to-buy list. Stick to Andromeda, and skip the Whirlpool. $399 00. It could really use an update to its coatings. Orion nebula shot with Canon T3i and Rokinon 135mm @ F2.0 150 shots with dark bias and flats stacked and edited. @juksu - you're such a hypocrite. Whats the best camera for around $2000? This has several advantages from less demanding tracking accuracy, to being able to use a lower ISO setting. In this configuration, the lens is still a very fast F3.4. The Sadr Region in Cygnus, including the Crescent Nebula by Eric Cauble. Great question Scott I think it depends on the image. At under 900USD, it's a steal. Instead it means the style of rendering. The OP admits he limited experience with lenses other than what he has. Rokinon 135mm F/2 Lens for ASTROPHOTOGRAPHY. My 24-70L needs to be stopped down to f5.6 to begin to match the sharpness of my 135L at f2.0 (the test shots were of the portrait of Andrew Jackson on a $20 bill). About 3 hours of exposures split between Narrowband, Broadband and short exposure shots to make an HDR image. I therefore reduce the aperture at the front end of the lens (as an aperture stop) by screwing in a series of step-down rings into the filter thread. The sigma 150mm f2.8 tests very well, zeiss 135mm apo sonnar, and leica 180mm f3.5 apo all proven performers on star tests. If you want the best possible image quality, and you must have autofocus, and you don't care if it is a bit heavy (maybe you need it for studio use), buy the Sigma. If you shoot things in motion on a Canon body, and need some reach without massive bulk, this is the one I recommend. My Canon EOS 60Da with the Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 mounted to a Fornax Mounts LighTrack II. (purchased for $1,000), reviewed February 4th, 2010 I loved the Nikon 80-400G for a year, or so, and then found everything with it wrong, and got rid of it. My tests on it are described on http://pikespeakphoto.com/tests/canonlens135.html, i have never been a prime lens fan, just seems to leave you feeling trapped in a single dimension. Not only does it let you travel light, but impressive wide field projects are often more successful when captured under a dark sky. Whatever lens you pick in the end, you will make a great purchase. If the telescope mount is precisely aligned to the celestial north pole, unguided exposures of one to two minutes are possible. It is really thanks to another commentator pointing out something that finally makes sense out of this mess: This article is by someone who just got his first first telephoto ever, and is writing about how he feels when he is trying it out. I will say that at F/4 this lens is extremely sharp corner to corner when used on my 60Da. - posted in Beginning Deep Sky Imaging: I have recently received my star adventurer and as of now only have the star adventurer, benro tripod (super stable), and a unmodded canon t2i with only a 18-55mm lens. The original poster is right that it was a compromise though and stopping down was necessary for critical sharpness and a better image. SIx months on from buying it this has become my favourite lens ever, beating my previous favourite (Leica's 4th version of the 35mm Summicron for its M-series rangefinders). But I would argue that a 135mm F2 lens produces even greater bokeh, thanks to the long focal length that compresses the background far more than the 85mm lens. And as this article clearly shows, no amount of blurr will make a poorly composed photo good. One of Canon's best lenses for a reasonable price. But you are talking more than 2x crop (cut half by width and height) and that leaves you to twice smaller resolution == quarter of the Mpix count.So now your 42Mpix A7rII is only a 10.5Mpix. This allows for less aggressive camera settings for night photography such as using a lower ISO setting and shorter exposure. Robert. (purchased for $650), reviewed June 6th, 2008 Super Sharp.Super Fast AF. modest cost for "L" series, wonderful optics and fast speed, nitpicking, but not a circular aperature and no weather sealing. Lens hood - when I bought this lens years ago the included hood was rather cheap (perhaps Canon has updated the hood) by comparison with other hoods. What's it got and what's it like to use? Tiring. This image of NGC 7000 was done at F/4 at iso 800 with a Canon 20D mod. Such "full spectrum" cameras are somewhat more sensitive in the ultraviolet, but much more sensitive in the deep red and infrared. With todays huge variety of digital sensors, each with their own characteristics, in-camera and post-processing etc., much depends on the given combination of your photo gear to create a certain effect. I haven't seen compassion with the excellent Zeiss lens you quote (That BTW costs at least 3.5-4 times, yet a good comparison as similar to Zeiss, Samyang believes in providing the exceptional Image Quality, with Manual focus) but compare with Canon's L 135mm F2.0, that by many reviews, is considered as one the best Canon lenses ever made (Not .
Command To Make Lava Rise Every Minute In Minecraft,
Convert Regression Coefficient To Percentage,
Did Robert Wadlow Have A Wife,
Charity Golf Tournament Florida,
Fake Social To Get Apartment,
Articles C